Harris, T. Optimizing for Engagement: Understanding the Use of Compelling Technology on Internet Platforms. Testimony on behalf of the Center for Human Technology. https://www.commerce.senate.gov/2019/6/optimizing-for-engagement-understanding-the-use-of-persuasive- technology-on-internet-platform (US Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation; June 25, 2019).2.
A. Baddeley, V. Lewis, M. Eldridge & N. Thomson Attention and Retrieval from Long-Term Memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen.. 113518–540 (1984).
Google Scholar article3.
Craik, FI, Govoni, R., Naveh-Benjamin, M. & Anderson, ND The effects of divided attention on coding and retrieval processes in human memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen.. 125159–180 (1996).
CAS Article Google Scholar4.
Anderson, MC & Spellman, BA On the Status of Inhibition Mechanisms in Cognition: Memory Retrieval as a Model Case. Psychol. Rev.. 10268–100 (1995).
CAS Article Google Scholar5.
Evans, LH & Herron, JE Event-related potentials before retrieval predict the source memory during the task switch. Neuroimage 194174–181 (2019).
Google Scholar article6.
Curran, T. The effects of attention and trust on the hypothetical ERP correlate with memory and familiarity. Neuropsychologia 421088–1106 (2004).
Google Scholar article7.
Klimesch, W. α-band oscillations, attention and controlled access to stored information. Trends Cogn. Sci. 16606–617 (2012).
Google Scholar article8.
Hanslmayr, S., Staudigl, T. & Fellner, MC The oscillation power decreases and the long-term memory: the information about the desynchronization hypothesis. Front. To hum. Neurosci. 674 (2012).
Google Scholar article9.
Jin, CY, Borst, JP and van Vugt, MK Predicting the general wandering of thoughts with the EEG. Cogn. Influence. Behav. Neurosci. 191059–1073 (2019).
Google Scholar article10.
Unsworth, N. & Robison, MK The role of arousal in working memory capacity variation and attention control: a latent variable pupillometry study. J. Exp. Psychol. Learning. Mem. Cogn. 431962–1987 (2017).
Google Scholar article11.
Unsworth, N. & Robison, MK pupils correlate with persistent attention deficit. Cogn. Influence. Behav. Neurosci. 16601–615 (2016).
Google Scholar article12.
Konishi, M., Brown, K., Battaglini, L. & Smallwood, J. When Attention Wanderers: Pupillometric Signatures of Variations in External Attention. Understanding 16816–26 (2017).
Google Scholar article13.
Fortenbaugh FC, J. DeGutis & M. Esterman Recent theoretical, neural, and clinical advances in research on sustained attention. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 139670–91 (2017).
ADS Article Google Scholar14.
Unsworth, N. Individual differences in long-term memory. Psychol. Stier. 14579–139 (2019).
Google Scholar articlefifteen.
Kahana, MJ, Aggarwal, EV & Phan, TD The puzzle of variability in human memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learning. Mem. Cogn. 441857–1863 (2018).
Google Scholar article16.
Uncapher, MR & Wagner, AD Heads and Heads of Media Multitaskers: Current Findings and Future Directions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. United States of America 1159889–9896 (2018).
CAS Article Google Scholar17.
Ralph, BCW, Thomson, DR, Seli, P., Carriere, JS & Smilek, D. Media multitasking and behavioral measures with sustained attention. Ten. Perceive. Psychophys. 77390–401 (2015).
Google Scholar article18.
Uncapher, MR, K. Thieu, M. & Wagner, AD Multitasking and Media Memory: Differences in Working Memory and Long-Term Memory. Psychon. Stier. Rev.. 23483–490 (2016).
Google Scholar article19.
Baumgartner, SE, van der Schuur, WA, Lemmens, JS & te Poel, F. The relationship between media multitasking and attention problems in adolescents: results of two longitudinal studies. Hmm Spread. Res. 443–30 (2018).
Google Scholar article20.
Macdonald, JSP, Mathan, S. & Yeung, N. Variations in subjective state of attention from trial to trial are reflected in sustained prestimulus EEG alpha oscillations. Front. Psychol. 282 (2011).
Google Scholar article21.
Unsworth, N. & Robison, MK Arousal Tracking and Wandering with Pupillometry. Cogn. Influence. Behav. Neurosci. 18638–664 (2018).
Google Scholar article22.
Dobbins, IG & Wagner, AD Domain-general and domain-specific prefrontal mechanisms for event remembering and novelty detection. Cereb. cortex 29150–166 (2005).
Esterman, M., Noonan, SK, Rosenberg, M. & Degutis, J. In the zone or in the zone? Tracking behavioral and neural fluctuations with sustained attention. Cereb. cortex 232712–2723 (2013).
Google Scholar article24.
Ophir, E., Nass, C. & Wagner, AD Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. United States of America 10615583–15587 (2009).
ADS CAS Article Google Scholar25.
Ralph, BCW, Thomson, DR, Cheyne, JA and Smilek, D. Media multitasking and attention deficit in everyday life. Psychol. Res. 78661–669 (2014).
Google Scholar article26.
Herron, JE & Evans, LH Preparation brings success: brain activity predicts memory. cortex 1061–11 (2018).
Google Scholar article27.
Forstmann, BU, Ridderinkhof, KR, Kaiser, J. & Bledowski, C. At your own risk: an ERP study on voluntary selection processes for task sets in the medial frontal cortex. Cogn. Influence. Behav. Neurosci. 7286–296 (2007).
Google Scholar article28.
Rugg, MD & Curran, T. Event-Related Potentials and Recognition Memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11251–257 (2007).
Google Scholar article29.
Ra, CK et al. Association of the use of digital media with subsequent symptoms of attention deficit / hyperactivity disorder in adolescents. Jam. With. Assoc. 320255–263 (2018).
Google Scholar article30.
Hanslmayr, S. et al. The relationship between brain vibrations and BOLD signal during memory formation: a combined EEG-fMRI study. J. Neurosci. 3115674–15680 (2011).
CAS Article Google Scholar31.
Kessler, RC et al. The World Health Organization’s ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) for Adults: a short screening scale for use in the general population. Psychol. With. 35245–256 (2005).
Google Scholar article32.
Patton, JH, Stanford, MS & Barratt, ES Factor structure of the Barratt impulsivity scale. J. Clin. Psychol. 51768–774 (1995).
CAS Article Google Scholar33.
Green, CS & Bavelier, D. Action video game experience changes the spatial resolution of vision. Psychol. Sci. 1888–94 (2007).
CAS Article Google Scholar34.
Carriere, JSA, Seli, P. & Smilek, D. Wandering in Mind and Body: Individual differences in wandering thoughts and inattention predict fidgeting. Kann. J. Exp. Psychol. 6719–31 (2013).
Google Scholar article35.
Carriere, JSA, Cheyne, JA, and Smilek, D. Daily attention lapse and memory disorders: the affective consequences of thoughtlessness. Deliberately. Cogn. 17835–847 (2008).
Google Scholar article36.
Brainard, DH The Toolbox for Psychophysics. Save dream. 10433–436 (1997).
CAS Article Google Scholar37.
Willenbockel, V. et al. Controlling Image Properties at Low Level: The SHINE Toolbox. Behav. Res. Methoden 42671–684 (2010).
Google Scholar article38.
Unsworth, N., Robison, MK & Miller, AL Pupils correlate with fluctuations in sustained attention. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 301241–1253 (2018).
Google Scholar article39.
Delorme, A. & Makeig, S. EEGLAB: An Open Source Toolbox for Analyzing EEG Dynamics in Single Experiments, Including Analysis of Independent Components. J. Neurosci. Methoden 1349–21 (2004).
Google Scholar article40.
Green, DM & Swets, YES Signal recognition theory and psychophysics (Wiley, 1966).41.
Kleifges, K., Bigdely-Shamlo, N., Kerick, SE and Robbins, KA BLINKER: Automated extraction of eye indices from the EEG that enables large-scale analysis. Front. Neurosci. 1112 (2017).
Google Scholar article42.
Goldinger, SD & Papesh, MH Pupillary dilation reflects the creation and retrieval of memories. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2190–95 (2012).
Google Scholar article43.
Otero, SC, Weekes, BS & Hutton, SB Student size changes during recognition memory. Psychophysiology 481346–1353 (2011).
Google Scholar article44.
Võ, ML-H. et al. The coupling of emotion and knowledge in the eye: introduction of the old / new effect of the pupil. Psychophysiology 45130–140 (2008).
Google Scholar article45.
Hong, L., Walz, JM and Sajda, P. Your eyes give you away: Prestimulus changes in the pupil diameter correlate with the task-related EEG dynamics after the stimulus. Plus one 9e91321 (2014).
ADS Article Google Scholar46.
Rosenberg, M., Noonan, S., DeGutis, J. & Esterman, M. Maintaining Visual Attention in the Face of Distraction: A Novel, Continuous, Continuous Performance Task. Ten. Perceive. Psychophys. 75426–439 (2013).
Google Scholar article47.
Madore, KP Memory failure predicted by loss of attention and media multitasking (dataset and analysis code). https://osf.io/zj7tb (Open Science Framework, 2020).48.
Madore, KP Memory failure predicted by loss of attention and media multitasking (dataset). https://doi.org/10.15154/1519022 (National Archives of the Institute for Mental Health, 2020).
These were the details of the news Memory failure predicted by loss of attention and media multitasking for this day. We hope that we have succeeded by giving you the full details and information. To follow all our news, you can subscribe to the alerts system or to one of our different systems to provide you with all that is new.
It is also worth noting that the original news has been published and is available at de24.news and the editorial team at AlKhaleej Today has confirmed it and it has been modified, and it may have been completely transferred or quoted from it and you can read and follow this news from its main source.